Skip to main content

William Doreski


Why were women called tomatoes
in the Thirties when depression
shrouded the rumpled continent?
We watch too many old movies,
their gray shades overlapping
and their dialogue too brittle

to ape in ordinary life.
The actors died so long ago
their photo-imagery has thinned
to one dimension, their contracts
expired in dusty sighs. Sporting
your tomato-red parka, you stalk

to the frozen river to watch
for eagles returning for spring.
Too early. The windy part of March
arrives tonight, banging trash cans
and snapping tree limbs to kill
the power and douse us in dark.

We might waste a day or two
with the generator whining
so loudly we can’t think aloud.
No one in old movies worries
about windstorms toppling trees
onto their sound-stage housing.

But in every film some chubby guy
in a bowler calls some woman
a tomato, and no one objects.
We wonder why that vinous fruit
rather than an orange, a squash,
a grape, apple, or cauliflower?

We don’t grow tomatoes anymore
because of the blight that rises
from the soil every year, a ghostly
infection that strips the plants
and leaves the bold fruit dangling
in a dismal world of decay.

Jardin des Plantes

Folded into an envelope,
you mailed yourself to Paris.
How lean you must have felt,

evading the global quarantine.
Roaming the fifth arrondissement
with your spider senses tingling,

you settle in the Jardin des Plantes
with croissant and a fistful
of latte to warm you while daylight

enrichens over limestone blocks
teeming with students too young
to have tasted the many pastels

painting you into this corner.
I’ll never hear from you again,
but expending yourself in books

in a language you’re just learning
numbed you to New York memories
perpendicular to everything

you believe about the course of life.
We couldn’t live together with
those verticals intersecting us

every time we stepped outside.
The restaurants swayed like shipwrecks.
The bookstores offered raw text

too dense for us to process.
No wonder you thinned to slip
between horizontal layers

and land with finances intact
in a far more flexible city.
Having finished your latte,

you roam among the Alpine plants,
a tangle of competing stems.
Already spring has so advanced

that pink and purple flowers
demand that you identify them.
You want to lie naked in the mat

of vegetation, but even
in Paris someone might notice,
and some officious gendarme

might refold and mail you back
to the city of shadows you left
to enjoy more primal dimensions.

William Doreski lives in Peterborough, New Hampshire. He has taught at several colleges and universities. His most recent book of poetry is Mist in Their Eyes (2021).  He has published three critical studies, including Robert Lowell’s Shifting Colors.  His essays, poetry, fiction, and reviews have appeared in various journals.


  1. I quite liked "Jardin" - fresh observation, interesting mixed tone. "We couldn’t live together with /
    those verticals intersecting us" particularly good.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ed Dorn's # 22 From Twenty-four Love Poems

                                               from Jacket The strengthy message here in #22 of 24 Love Songs can be summed up in two lines: ['There is/no sense to beauty. . .' and '. . .How/ the world is shit/ and I mean all of it] What I also like about this brief poem is the interplay between the title of the book and the subject of the poems (love/anti-love (which is not hate)): it's all a mass of contradictions, like love. And I have to say that the shorter poems of the Love Songs and the last book he wrote before dying (Chemo Sábe) seem to me much better and more memorable than the Slinger/Gunslinger poems. These (generally) later poems probably attempt less stylistically, but are more sure-handed, hacked from a soap bar, maybe. Easy to use, but disappear after use. In any case, Dorn is well worth the reading and re-reading, for me, though he'll never become one of my favorites. And doesn't every poet want that, dead or alive? ;-) #22 The agony

Jim Daniels

Half Days My daughter, thirteen, pale shred of herself, fought an unidentified infection in her spine as it softened her discs into disappearance. I’d unread that story if she were young and still listened to lullabies. After she got discharged, I set an alarm for two a.m. each night to shoot antibiotics into her port while she slept, her limp arm resting in my hand. Her return to school: half days—follow my dotted line smearing across months of sleepless breadcrumbs— at noon I idled high, anxious in the school driveway rattling off the latest test results in the zero gravity of fear. She startled me with the brittle thunk of the car door slam, then snapped at me for staring at her friends as they strolled across the street to the cafeteria, creeping them out, she said, embarrassed by illness like hard acne or a blooming hickey, wrong music or flakey hair, or the tacky middle-school jumper she no longer had to wear. I was there to drive her to

Paul Blackburn and Sexism

How does one respond to sexism in poets whose work seems to be filled with it, like Blackburn? The quick answer most people would give is: ignore it. Yet here I am, reading more and more, and yes, enjoying, the supposedly sexist work of Paul Blackburn and wondering why there isn't much if any criticism of his important work in the late 50s and 60s, when he served as gatekeeper and recorder of many readings which have helped establish the avant-garde presence and reading scene in New York as well as given us great historical insight into the poets associated at that time with the New York scene.  And of course I'm thinking about his poems, which kept him in the middle of things as a talent in his own right. It's not difficult, unfortunately to see why he's not read, and that makes me sad. His poetry is worth more than a few cursory footnotes to the era. I've come to the conclusion now, after dipping into the collected poems at length, but randomly, and reading fo